課程資訊
課程名稱
貧窮社會學專題討論
Seminar on Sociology of Poverty 
開課學期
108-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  社會學研究所  
授課教師
黃克先 
課號
Soc7071 
課程識別碼
325 M2350 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期五2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
社205 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:15人
外系人數限制:4人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082Soc7071_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

貧窮社會學專題討論 

課程目標
*****以下課程大綱尚待更新*** 
課程要求
*****以下課程大綱尚待更新*** 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
待補 
參考書目
*****以下課程大綱尚待更新*** 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
每週memo 
50% 
共有14週須閱讀文本,自己課堂口頭報告當週毋須撰寫,另可選擇3週不寫。原則上每週memo至少要有1000字。請於週四下午四點以前上傳ceiba給所有修課的人及授課老師參考,晚交將酌情扣分或不記分。請大家在來上課以前,可以讀一讀其他人的memo。 memo撰寫原則如下:請以自己的方式簡述你對該週讀物的理解並回應之。內容應包括(1)給予定位該研究在整個領域中的位置或系譜,並簡要梳理出作者的研究取徑及貢獻(2)對作者的方法、分析視角、論證及規範性立場予以評述(3)提出一個值得討論的問題(4)(要或不要皆可) 可以帶入其他貧窮研究者的觀點或取徑,與該週讀物進行意念上的對談,比較各種方面上的差異,並解釋是何造就了該差異(5)(要或不要皆可)帶入本土或其他比較例子反思,也可以與你關懷的議題對話。 
2. 
課堂發言 
10% 
言之有物,積極參與,良好的分享倫理,是評分的重點。 
3. 
期末報告 
25% 
請運用課堂上學習到理論概念及論點,發展自己的視角,藉此分析自己關心的貧窮相關群體或現象,最終以proposal的形式呈現期末報告,包括口頭及書面。期末報告則要有6000字左右。(當然,字數限制只是原則性的提醒,內容品質才是評分重點)  
4. 
摘要補充閱讀 
5% 
挑選其中一篇補充閱讀,在該週交出摘要 (一至二千字) 並以口頭簡單報告 (五到十分鐘) 
5. 
課堂口頭報告 
10% 
負責該週必讀文本之摘要,請介紹作者背景、文本綱要及論證,帶領同學們有方向地(而非流水帳)瀏覽過;在此基礎上設計問題與討論。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
3/06  課程簡介

***欲修課者第一堂課請務必出席,確認授課內容*****
每週閱讀原則上80頁左右  
第2週
3/13  再思貧窮:社會學的觀點

1. Simmel, Georg. 1971. The Poor, in D. Levine (ed.) Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.150-178

2. Honneth, A., & Farrell, J. (1997). Recognition and Moral Obligation. Social Research, 64(1), 16-35.

補充閱讀:
1) Sen, Amartya (2001)《經濟發展與自由》,劉楚俊譯。台北:先覺。

2) Young, Iris. 2017[1990]. 〈壓迫的五張臉孔〉,《正義與差異政治》,陳雅馨譯,台北:商周出版。

3) Piketty, Thomas. 2014[2013] 《廿一世紀資本論》,詹文碩、陳以禮譯。新北:衛城。 
第3週
3/20  貧窮典範的轉移:新自由主義經濟變遷與不平等

1. Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 20-106 (數頁是圖表).

補充閱讀:

1) Harvey, David. 2008. 〈新自由主義與階級力量的復辟〉出自《新自由主義化的空間》,王志弘譯。台北:群學。頁7-44。
2) Ferguson, James. 2015. Giving a Man Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution. Duke University Press.

3) Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Appendix: Urban Poverty: A State-of-the-Art Review of the Literature, pp. 165-187.
 
第4週
3/27  新自由主義國家的貧窮政策:自由放任的家父長作風?

1. Soss, Joe, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chapter 8, 9, 10, pp. 176-261

補充閱讀:

1) Wacquant, Loic. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Duke University Press. Chapter 2: The Criminalization of Poverty in the Post-civil Rights Era, pp. 41-75.

2) Ong, Aihwa. 2003. Chapter 8: The Ambivalence of Salvation, in Buddha is Hiding: Refugees, Citizenship and the new America. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 195- 228 
第5週
4/03  春假
閱讀作業:貧窮文化觀點及結構觀的辯論 (雖不上課,但仍請撰寫memo,並寄給老師)

1. David Harding. 2010. Living the drama: Community, Conflict, and Culture among Inner‑City Boys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 239-252

2. Small, Mario, David Harding and Michele Lamont. 2010. Reconsidering Culture and Poverty. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 629: 6-29.

3. Wilson, William Julius. 2010. Why Both Social Structure and Culture Matter in a Holistic Analysis of Inner-city Poverty. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 629: 200-219. 
第6週
4/10  國家象徵暴力與貧窮的空間集中化:失根者的悲慘世界

1. Pierre Bourdieu. 2000[1993]. To the Reader, The Space of Points of View, Site Effects, The Abdication of the State, Outcasts on the Inside (with Patrick Champagne),The Contradictions of Inheritance, and Understanding. In Pierre Bourdieu et al.. The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, translated by Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson. Stanford University Press.

2. Loic Wacqaunt 2000[1993] America as Social Dystopia, Ibid.

補充閱讀:

3) Wacquant, Loïc (2008) Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press, Introduction

4) Bourgois Philippe and Jeff Schonberg. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend. University of California press  
第7週
4/17  貧窮生活百事哀:底層日常與福利制度,兼論深度訪談

1. Edin, Kathryn and Laura Lein. 1997. Chapter 3: Why Don’t Welfare-reliant Mothers Go to Work? in Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-wage Work. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 60-87

2. Edin, Kathryn and Maria Kefalas. 2005. Chapter 1: “Before We Had a Baby…” in Promises I can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood before Marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp.27-49

3. Edin, Kathryn and Timothy Nelson and Joanna Miranda Reed. 2013. Chapter 8: The New Package Deal. in Doing the Best I Can: Fatherhood in the Inner City. Berkeley: University of California Press, 202-228.

補充閱讀:

1) Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2010[2001]《我在底層的生活》,林家瑄譯。台北:左岸。

2) Edin, Kathryn and H. Luke Scaefer 2015. $2.00 a Day. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.  
第8週
4/24  警察與司法陰影下的社會生活:底層民族誌的書寫政治

1. Goffman, Alice. 2018[2014] 《全員在逃》(On the Run) 李宗義、許雅淑譯新北:衛城。請讀序、附錄,第六、七章。。

補充閱讀:

1) Fassin, Didier (2013) Enforcing order: An ethnography of urban policing. London: Polity, chapter 4 (Violence) and 5 (Discrimination). (請一位同學摘要口頭報告)

2) Stuart, Forrest (2016) Down, Out and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row. University of Chicago Press (police-wiseness)

3) Western, Bruce and Becky Pettit. 2010. Incarceration & Social Inequality, Daedalus 139(3): 8-19 
第9週
5/01  貧窮青少年的次文化及再生產

1. Rios, Victor. 2011. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys. New York: New York University Press, Chapter 4-7, pp. 74-156

補充閱讀:

1) Carter, Prudence L. 2003. “‘Black’ Cultural Capital, Status Positioning, and Schooling Conflicts for Low-Income African American Youth.” Social Problems 50(1): 136-155.

2) Rios, Victor. 2017. Human Target. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

3) Brown, Tamara Mose. 2011. Raising Brooklyn: Nannies, Childcare, and Caribbeans Creating Community. New York: New York University Press. 
第10週
5/08  貧民與國家的扭曲相遇及能動性:生命史自傳敘事的力量

1. Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia. 2015. The Hero’s Fight: African Americans in West Baltimore and the Shadow of the State. Princeton University Press, pp. 113-191.

補充閱讀:

1) Watkins-Hayes, Celeste. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

2) Sullivan, Susan Crawford. 2011. Chapter2: Building Blocks: Theory, Religious Practices, and Churches, in Living Faith: Everyday Religion and Mothers in Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 27-65 
第11週
5/15  科技時代下的貧窮治理

1. Headworth, Spencer (2019) Getting to Know You: Welfare Fraud Investigation and the Appropriation of Social Ties. American Sociological Review 84(1): 1-26.

2. Eubanks, Virginia (2017) Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 1-38

補充:
1) Hughes, Cayce C. (2019) From the Long Arm of the State to Eyes on the Street: How Poor African American Mothers Navigate Survalliance in the Social Safety Net. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 48(3): 339-376 
第12週
5/22  不能只窺視貧窮者:關係性民族誌的啟發

1. Desmond, Mathew. 2017[2016]《下一個家在何方》(Evicted),胡訢諄、鄭煥昇譯,台北:時報。Part 1

補充閱讀:

1) Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547-579.

2) Burawoy, M. (2017) On Desmond: the limits of spontaneous sociology. Theory and Society 46, 261–284  
第13週
5/29  貧窮地區的社會資本:魚缸裡的悲劇?

1. Venkatesh, Sudhir Alladi. 2006. Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 95-151

2. Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia. 2015. Chapter 10: Paradoxes of Social Capital. In The Hero’s Fight: African Americans in West Baltimore and the Shadow of the State. Princeton University Press, pp. 192-212.

補充閱讀:

1) Desmond, Mathew. 2017[2016] 〈第十二章:免洗的人際關係〉,《下一個家在何方》(Evicted),胡訢諄、鄭煥昇譯,台北:時報

2) Duck, Waverly. 2015. No Way Out: Precarious Living in the Shadow of Poverty and Drug Dealing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 
第14週
6/05  窮窮相斥:貧窮者的尊嚴、區異與流動

1. 黃克先. 2019.〈「𨑨迌人」、「做事人」與「艱苦人」:台灣無家者場域內的行動主體〉, 《台灣社會學》38期,頁63-114。

2. Smith, Sundra. 2005. “Don’t Put My Name on It: Social Capital Avtivation and Job-Finding Assistance among the Black Urban Poor,” American Journal of Sociology 111(1): 1-57.

補充閱讀:

1)Gowen, Teresa. 2010. Hobos, Hustlers, and Backsliders: Homeless in San Francisco. 2010. MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.27-29, 47-56, 147-177

2)Small, M. L. 2004. The Rise and Decline of Local Participation, Part 2: Cohorts and Collective Narratives. In Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago press, PP. 63-90

3)Snow, David A., and Leon Anderson. 1993. Down on Their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People. California: University of California Press.  
第15週
6/12  社會交往中的復原力:尊嚴、人生導師及小團體動力

1. Duneier, Mitchell. (2018[1999])《人行道》(Sidewalk)。黃克先、劉思潔譯。新北:游擊文化。第一部、第二部及後記。

補充閱讀:

1) Duneier, Mitchel. 1992. Slim Table. Chicago: University of Chicago University.

2) Stack, Carol. 1974. All Our Kin. University of Chicago Press.

(貧窮文化的相關爭論) 
第16週
6/19  期末報告